Solana on Base Volume Analysis
Comprehensive analysis of trading patterns for the bridged SOL token on Base Network
Volume Classification
Wash Trading
Organic Trading
Block Sync Status
Live Backfill Status Checking...
Top Wash Traders
| # | Address | Volume | Balance % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading... | |||
Top Organic Traders
| # | Address | Volume | Counterparties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading... | |||
Classification Methodology
How we distinguish wash trading from organic volume
Overview
This analysis examines all ERC-20 transfer transactions for the SOL token on Base network starting from block 38,699,339 (token inception). Each address is classified as either "wash trading" or "organic" based on their trading patterns.
Wash trading is identified by addresses that repeatedly buy and sell nearly equal amounts, resulting in minimal net position changes while generating significant volume. These addresses typically interact with very few counterparties (often just 1-3 DEX pools).
Classification Criteria
An address is classified as WASH TRADING if it meets ALL of the following:
-
Balance Ratio > 85%
The ratio of sent to received volume must be greater than 85%. This indicates the address is buying and selling nearly equal amounts (e.g., sent 1000 SOL and received 950 SOL = 95% balance ratio). -
Net Position < 15% of Average Volume
The absolute difference between received and sent volume must be less than 15% of the average volume. This confirms minimal accumulation or distribution. -
Fewer Than 10 Counterparties
The address must interact with fewer than 10 unique counterparties. Legitimate routers and aggregators interact with hundreds of addresses, while wash traders typically use 1-3 DEX pools. -
Total Volume > 100 SOL
Minimum volume threshold to filter out dust and noise.
Exclusions
Addresses are classified as ORGANIC if they:
-
Have Many Counterparties (>50)
Addresses interacting with 50+ counterparties are likely DEX routers, aggregators, or other infrastructure - not wash traders. -
Have Significant Net Position
Addresses that accumulate or distribute significant amounts (net position >15% of volume) are engaging in real buying/selling. -
Have Imbalanced Buy/Sell Ratio
Addresses where buy and sell volumes differ significantly (balance ratio <85%) are not round-tripping.
Pool Volume Exclusion
Important: The Aerodrome SOL/WETH pool
(0xb30540172f1b37d1ee1d109e49f883e935e69219)
is excluded from the wash/organic percentage calculation because:
-
It's Infrastructure, Not a Trader
The pool is the counterparty for all swaps. When a wash trader sells, the pool "receives" that volume. Including pool volume would double-count and misrepresent the data.
Aerodrome Reward Mechanism
Understanding how volume farmers profit from Aerodrome's incentive structure is key to analyzing this behavior. Aerodrome Finance is a next-generation AMM on Base that uses the ve(3,3) tokenomics model.
AERO Token
0x940181a94A35A4569E4529A3CDfB74e38FD98631AERO is Aerodrome's native token. It can be locked into veAERO (vote-escrowed AERO) to participate in governance and earn protocol fees. veAERO holders vote on which pools receive AERO emissions each epoch.
Liquidity Provider Revenue Streams
Every swap through the pool pays a 0.3% fee to liquidity providers, split proportionally by their share of the pool. The SOL/WETH pool uses Slipstream (concentrated liquidity).
Fee = Swap Volume × 0.003 × (Your Liquidity / Total Liquidity)
veAERO holders vote on which pools receive AERO emissions each week. LPs who stake their LP positions
in the gauge (0xC6e211fF1D04A1728ab011406AD42EF529Cb3886)
earn AERO tokens proportional to their staked liquidity.
LPs must manually claim AERO rewards from the gauge contract
Users can lock AERO into veAERO to gain voting power. veAERO holders:
- Vote on which pools receive AERO emissions
- Earn 100% of trading fees from pools they vote for
- Receive bribes from protocols seeking votes
Protocols can offer bribes to veAERO voters to direct emissions to their pools. These are typically paid in the protocol's native token or stablecoins and go to voters, not LPs directly.
How the Volume Farmer Exploits This
The volume farmer uses a smart contract to repeatedly add and remove liquidity, exploiting the system in the following ways:
Deposits SOL + USDC into a narrow price range (Slipstream concentrated liquidity), maximizing capital efficiency.
Immediately stakes the Slipstream Position NFT in the gauge to start accruing AERO emissions.
Withdraws liquidity shortly after, minimizing impermanent loss risk while generating SOL transfer "volume."
This process is automated and repeated thousands of times, inflating the token's apparent trading volume.
Observed On-Chain Rewards
Note: The relatively modest profit (~$2,900) compared to the massive volume (18.6M SOL) suggests the primary goal may be inflating volume metrics rather than pure profit extraction. This could be to make the token appear more actively traded than it actually is, potentially to attract real traders or boost rankings on analytics platforms.
Proof: Volume Farming via LP Churning
We have identified conclusive evidence of volume farming through liquidity manipulation. The top "wash trader" is actually a smart contract wallet that repeatedly adds and removes liquidity.
The Mechanism (LP Churning)
- ADD LIQUIDITY: Contract sends SOL + USDC to the Aerodrome pool
- RECEIVE NFT: Gets Slipstream Position NFT representing LP position
- STAKE: Deposits NFT in gauge for AERO rewards
- REMOVE: Shortly after, removes liquidity (gets SOL + USDC back)
- REPEAT: This process repeats ~50,000 times
- RESULT: Net position ≈ 0, but massive "volume" generated
This is NOT traditional wash trading (fake trades between addresses).
Instead, it's LP churning - repeatedly adding/removing liquidity to artificially inflate
transfer volume while maintaining near-zero net exposure. The actual transaction initiator is
0xF28C66a9dFA53eeaF4b25d280B294C8835E10EA9,
who controls the smart contract.
Volume Farmer #1 (Smart Contract)
Smart Contract Address
0x7c460d504c1600fb8c030ff0d3b7e02bab268309
View on Basescan
Actual Owner (Transaction Initiator)
0xF28C66a9dFA53eeaF4b25d280B294C8835E10EA9
View on Basescan
Transaction Evidence (Verified on Basescan)
This transaction (user-provided evidence) shows the full LP churning flow:
- Initiator:
0xF28C66a9dFA53eeaF4b25d280B294C8835E10EA9calls contract - Contract sends: 84.72 SOL + 15,247 USDC to pool
- Mint NFT: Slipstream Position NFT #95817 minted to contract
- Stake: NFT deposited to gauge for AERO rewards
Volume Farmer #2 (Smart Contract)
This is the largest volume farmer - accounting for over 833,000 transactions and 29.5M SOL in combined LP churning volume. Like Farmer #1, this is a smart contract that repeatedly adds/removes liquidity.
Smart Contract Address
0xEcBE25D69f0Bc85C8Eb42AE9A3b9A212DCed96e6
View on Basescan
Actual Owner (Transaction Initiator)
0x4160f36bF377c0CF98d86397c5f1A3e3bF11C48F
View on Basescan
Transaction Evidence (Verified on Basescan)
This transaction shows the remove liquidity flow for Farmer #2:
- Initiator:
0x4160f36bF377c0CF98d86397c5f1A3e3bF11C48Fcalls contract - Gauge sends AERO: 0.079 AERO reward claimed
- Pool returns: 124.85 SOL ($17,060) + 2,770.28 USDC
- NFT transferred: Slipstream Position NFT moved from gauge
Conclusion
Why This is Conclusive Proof of Volume Farming
- Both addresses are smart contracts controlled by EOAs - indicating automated operations
- They interact with only 2 counterparties (the pool and gauge) - no real trading activity
- Add/remove liquidity amounts are nearly identical - no actual market exposure
- Pattern repeats 940,000+ times - clearly automated LP churning
- Net position change is 0.038% despite 66.9M SOL in volume
- Both have a 99.99-100.18% balance ratio (adds ~= removes)
- They receive AERO rewards from gauge staking during the brief holding period
- All transactions verified on Basescan - click any link above to verify
Combined Impact of Both Volume Farmers
These two addresses alone generated 66.9 million SOL in LP churning volume (87.8% of all transfers) with a net position change of only ~25,675 SOL (0.038% of volume).
Data Source
Transaction data is fetched from the Routescan API (Etherscan-compatible endpoint for Base network). Analysis starts from block 38,699,339 (first SOL token transaction) and continues to the current block.
The target is approximately 2,352,771 transactions as shown on Basescan. This analysis is updated in real-time as more transactions are fetched.
Token Contract: CrossChainERC20 (Minimal Proxy) - 9 decimals
Wash Trading Addresses
All addresses classified as wash trading based on their trading patterns
Complete List (0 addresses)
| # | Address & Label | Volume (SOL) | % of Total | Balance % | Counterparties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading... | |||||
Organic Addresses
All addresses classified as organic traders
Complete List (0 addresses)
| # | Address & Label | Volume (SOL) | % of Total | Balance % | Counterparties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading... | |||||